The Aristotle And Immanuel Kant - 1655 Words

The philosophers Aristotle and Immanuel Kant express the sources of virtuous and dutiful actions in a similar, yet different way. Both philosophers agree that an action has moral worth, when it is preformed for its own sake. However, the difference contains a more significant meaning. Aristotle believes that pleasure can be included when preforming an action; while Kant believes that a duty is preforming the right action without the need of inclinations. In this paper, I will present a similarity and difference between Aristotle’s concept of a virtuous act and Kant’s discussion of dutiful action. In The Nicomachean Ethics, The source of a virtuous action happens when your passions and thoughts are balanced. It is balanced when there is†¦show more content†¦Furthermore, Aristotle believes when the virtuous person does an action only through the sake of it self there is no other means to the end and one will eventually become virtuous. However, when the action is preformed for the sake of something else, then a person will not reach the highest form of virtue. The reason for this is when the action that is preformed for the sake of something else, then it will not reach complete happiness because it will always desire more. Therefore, happiness is the highest act of virtue because it is the only end in every action we preform. A person that preforms an action for the sake of being happy requires many steps to eventually reach the stage of happiness. When there are steps involved to reach happiness, then the action is preformed for the sake of something else and not in itself. Such as a person who wants to eat healthier because their end motive is to be happy. Therefore, the action is not preformed for the sake of just to eat healthy but to reach happiness. However, to become virtuous, a person will preform actions that make them virtuous with a firm and unchangeable character. It is a skill that is made through a habit, Aristotle states, â€Å"legislators make the citizens good by preforming habits in them†(NE, P.23), such as preforming acts of bravery. But, a brave person needs to find a balance because being too brave will lead to excessShow MoreRelatedAristotle, Immanuel Kant And Kant2637 Words   |  11 Pagessuccessfully defined it. The philosophers I chose to analyze are Aristotle, Immanuel Kant and G.E. Moore and all three’s interpretations of what Good is and how does one achieve a good life. â€Å"The good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim.† To Aristotle, Good is defined by happiness and the means to which we took to achieve it. This truth is widely accepted, but the issue in this derives from what constitutes happiness. Aristotle attempts to answer this question in Nicomachean. He alsoRead MoreThe Ethical Theories Of Aristotle And Immanuel Kant1910 Words   |  8 Pagesand contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. The moral philosophies of Kant and Aristotle are dissimilar in the rationale they suggest for moral conduct. Theorists suggest what they believe is a normative ethical approach, which should be utilized as a guide to determining moral conduct. Kant bases his opinions of morality completely on reason, while Aristotle treated the virtuous person as sensing good about being good. Kant and Aristotle share the opinion, that ordinary humanRead MoreThe Principles Of Aristotle, Bertrand Russell, And Immanuel Kant1555 Words   |  7 Pagesbeing true and false. Modern logic descends mainly from the ancient Greek tradition. All three philosophers; Aristotle, Bertrand Russell, and Immanuel Kant theorized the question of what is logic. The greatest and most influential of Platos students was Aristotle, but the works of Aristotle do reflect his teachings from Plato but unlike Plato, Aristotle was concrete and practical. Aristotle defined logic as â€Å"new and necessary reasoning†, â€Å"new† because it allows us to learn what we do not know, andRead MoreImmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle: Morals and Ethical Codes1169 Words   |  5 Pageswithout thoroughly exploring their options. Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle are philosophers that focus on the topic of ethics, yet all have different outlooks. Kant is considered a non-consequentiality, which means he feels the intentions motives, and good will is more important than the results or consequences of an action. The backbone of Kants philosophy is the belief in the fundamental freedom of the individual. Kant did not indicate anarchy, but the idea of self-governmentRead MoreSocrates Plato Aristotle and Immanuel Kant Views on Happiness Government Religion and Objectivity2508 Words   |  11 Pageshappiness, or better yet, where happiness exists is a question that has been pondered by many great thinkers. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, Plato and Socrates had quite a bit to say on the subject. All of these well-known philosophers have a road map to happiness, religion, passion and objectivity. Yet, their theories differ ultimately in how to go about attaining each of them. For both Plato and Aristotle the good appears to be happiness. For Plato, this is where his interpretation of the meaning of EudaimonismRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 Pages Philosophical analysis of Aristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethicsRead MoreKant And Aristotle s Views On Ethics And Morals1480 Words   |  6 PagesProfessor Strom Philosophy 300 Class Section 1200 Recitation-Tuesday 10am 2/11/2015 What Is The Highest Good? Immanuel Kant and Aristotle are two of the most prominent philosophers on ethics and morals. Each has their own idea about human life and what the highest good is. It has even been said that in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Kant disproves Aristotle’s view. In order to prove that Kant successfully disproves Aristotle’s theory, we must first understand both theories. After a successfulRead MoreComparing Aristotle And John Stuart Mill1130 Words   |  5 Pagesconcentrate of the famous works of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. After meticulously analyzing each of the above philosophers’ texts, I personally prefer the position of utilitarian and Benthamite, John Stuart Mill. After comparing and contrasting the positions and reasonings of these philosophers, I will demonstrate my own reasons why I have chosen John Stuart Mill as the most established in his theory of the role of pleasure in morality. Aristotle was a particularly influentialRead MoreSolving Ethical Dilemmas Essay1501 Words   |  7 Pagesethical interpretations of philosophers Aristotle, Benedict de Spinoza, Immanuel Kant, and myself will be addressed regarding this particular dilemma. Aristotle sought a philosophy of happiness which would be applicable to each individual man. He believed virtue is never absolute. In other words, one rule can never apply to all men. Instead, the individual through lifes experiences must find the source which brings him the most happiness. More importantly, Aristotle reasoned that this source would neverRead MoreGrounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals And On Groveling By Immanuel Kant891 Words   |  4 PagesImmanuel Kant discusses the second and third translation pieces in â€Å"Key Selections.† In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals and On Groveling, Kant explains that humans have an animal-like nature. If Kant was charged with the statement, â€Å"Bottom line, humans are nothing more than insignificant creatures with an animal nature,† he would have a mixed response to the charge. Although Kant may not believe that neither humans or animals are insignificant, he would recognize the relation and similarities

My Code of Ethics - 1415 Words

Code of Ethics Personal or not, a code of ethics that is in accordance to the criterion of the Almighty God is among the most valuable asset for any individual or organization. In the case study chosen for this essay, the ethical issue involved is concerning business ethics in the area of integrity and uprightness. A firm is planning to expand their business in a country where transactions that seems to be bribery is a normal part of doing business. There are contractors establishing themselves as an agent for acquiring, or advancing the required licensing to operate in the state/country calling it payoffs. This practice is not clear whether it’s free from bribery although many firms have managed sign off legal documents saying it is†¦show more content†¦These matters are in the control of the Almighty God, and again as said on the previous paragraph, a different knowledge and understanding is required to clearly understand what is meant here. One quick example that may illumin ate regarding this topic lightly is, let’s say an individual would like to purchase a bicycle, searching of it at clothing department store may be considered a waste of time; similarly many look for true happiness that way. By definition the definition of happiness is â€Å"the state of being happy, an experience that makes you happy†, therefore an ethical or unethical individual may experience it. However, as stated above, true happiness is sustainable, clean and pure, which is tied to the knowledge of the Almighty God, free from desires, achieved only by the grace of God. Reflecting back to all the information, and knowledge we shared, and the many different theories we analyzed, there were none that neither modified nor alter any of my moral characteristics and principles. They are protected and kept the same as they were before, just like they are thought by the messenger of the Almighty peace be upon him. I did learn and receive plenty of different knowledge , and understanding of different philosophers including their theories. During the examining of theShow MoreRelatedMy Personal Code Of Ethics807 Words   |  4 Pagesassignments. At the start of the semester, the first assignment was a one page paper which described our position on our personal code of ethics. The paper was written in the first person and was to follow a clear line of reasoning, and comply with APA 6th edition grammar and style rules. At the end of the semester we were to, once again, write a paper on our personal code of ethics so that we could see our maturation in knowledge and values in contrast to the beginning of the course. We were also assignedRead MoreMy Professional Code Of Ethics1208 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do† said Poher Stewart (Lindstrom, 2012). Public health professionals follow a code of ethics in order to better serve their community by respecting the rights and choice of the individual they are helping. In this paper, I will list my professional code of ethics as a healthcare professional and provide examples of how I apply it to better serve my community and the athletes individually. Introduction PublicRead MoreMy Personal Code Of Ethic969 Words   |  4 PagesMy Personal Code of Ethic Personal ethic is what a person believes about morality and right and wrong. Ethic should and can give real and practical guidance to our lives: gives our best rational interests and without sacrificing others. My family, friends, and education have played profound roles in the development of my personal ethic: conscience, personal integrity, responsibility, and egalitarianism. Additionally, these influences approaches to determining what conduct is consistent with theseRead MoreMy Personal Code Of Ethics1487 Words   |  6 Pagesin savings than I ever would have had I been trying to save on my own. Since I am so happy with what Digit has done for me, I thought I’d share it with you, even though it doesn’t fit squarely in my niche. However, I figure we all want to save money, so I think you’d all be interested in what Digit has to offer. Affiliate Disclaimer: You will find a few links to Digit throughout this review. According to my personal Code of Ethics and in order to comply with FTC Compliance Standards, if the linkRead MoreMy Personal Code Of Ethics Essay1845 Words   |  8 PagesA. My Personal Code of Ethics 1. Core Values I am an Accounting student at the University of Baltimore. I have a list of core values in my mind, and I try to follow these values every day. When I make decisions in my life, I look at these values to make sure my decisions align with my values. My top three core values are career, family and friends, and personal growth. Within each core value, there are other values that I like to consider in my daily life. My first core value is career. I movedRead More My Personal Code of Ethics Essay2658 Words   |  11 Pagesmyself to the code and values that I am about to describe. As a person I have vast life experiences that have affected who I am and what I believe in. As a Public Relations professional it seems that our industry is often under ridicule for being unethical and known as spin doctors. As an ethical student and person I consider these key values as guiding stones to my applied ethical choices. Family, friends, school and religion have all made me the person I am today and influence my ethical choicesRead MoreMy Code Of Ethics The Primary Principles Are Integrity, Respect, And Empathy1500 Words   |  6 PagesIn my code of ethics the primary principles are integrity, respect, and empathy. I have always lived my life based off of theses three principles. Sometimes it feels challenging to live by these principles, but I always remember what my parents have taught me and I get motiva ted to keep living off these principles. My parent’s happiness matters a lot to me and that helps me stay motivated. I would never do something that would upset my parents or make them ashamed of me. They have given me everythingRead MoreThe Code Of Ethics, My Supervisor And I Reviewed At Length Essay2351 Words   |  10 Pagesaddressing the NASW code of ethics, my supervisor and I reviewed at length many of the internal issues I have had over the last year in the program. We discussed many issues ranging from Medicare/Medicaid to Immigration. Most of my own issues were internal and these internal issues did not come to play when engaging in the moment with the client. However, many of the issues that were being worked on between the client and myself, the growth of the client stagnated at times and my ability to provideRead MoreThe Code Of Ethics And Values1086 Words   |  5 Pages Each individual has a code of ethics which helps to establish morals. Morals play an import ant part when it comes to determining what is right and wrong. You should also have core values. I think the most important value to have is integrity. Integrity means to be honest in everything you do and to have high morals. I will be honest, sincere, and reliable. Another important value to have is to be caring. Each and every day, I will be considerate and help those that need it. Being caring means havingRead More Computer Ethics Essay1361 Words   |  6 PagesComputer Ethics A Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics (see Appendix A) was first presented by Dr. Ramon C. Barquins in his paper for the Computer Ethics Institute of the Brookings Institution entitled, In Pursuit of a Ten Commandments for Computer Ethics in May of 1992. Computer ethics is about principles related to behavior and decisions made by computer professionals and users, including software engineers, operators, managers, policy makers, as well as educators and students. This means

Anthem By Ayn Rand Essay Example For Students

Anthem By Ayn Rand Essay Imagine a world where the individual has been repressed to the point that theword I no longer exists. Now, as hellish as that sounds, imagine that youare the only one who has the capability to break free from the iron fists thatare choking you and your brothers. This is the life of Equality 7-2521, theprincipal character and narrator of Ayn Rands Anthem. Anthem takes place inthe dark ages of the future, in a totally collectivized world. This culture hasregressed to conditions reminiscent of Ancient Greece and the European DarkAges. In the midst of fear and subordination, one man stands alone. Equality7-2521 is not like his brothers. He is able think, create and defy. This makeshim extremely dangerous. He holds the threat of change in his hands and hisgovernment will stop at nothing to take it from him. Equalitys societyrepresses him because they are afraid of those that threaten the establishedorder. One major catalyst for change is intelligence. Equality displays evidenceof genius a t a young age. We, Equality 7-2521, were not happyin theHome of the Students. It was not that the learning was too hard for us. Itwastoo easy (Rand 16). In Equalitys society, it is evil to be differentfrom ones brothers, let alone to be better than they are. He is taught at anearly age to be ashamed of his intellectual superiority. This is a sin, to beborn with a head which is too quick (Rand 16). This device of suppression bymeans of shame was used in an attempt to stifle geniuses and, hence, pacify hissocietys fear of change. As Equality grew, he confirmed their fears. Duringhis lifetime he made many revelations and discoveries. His most profoundbreakthrough was his re-invention of electricity. We, Equality 7-2521, havediscovered a new power of nature. (Rand 54). He produced a primitive lightbulb. He wanted to use his invention to better his world. To the misfortune ofhis society, they loathed this new power. If they had accepted his ideasEquality would have been the literal and f igurative bringer of light (Gladstein43). Unfortunately for Equality, as well as his society, his discovery metviolent opposition and his brothers were not able to benefit from hisintelligence. Genius has historically been repressed. Geniuses of our past havebeen ostracized, punished, and martyred for presenting ideas that eventuallybettered their societies. Equality is no different. Equality 7-2521 is acreator and inventor in the tradition of Galileo, Edison, and Einstein (Gladstein27). These real-life geniuses dared to violate their societys norms andeventually their ideas were accepted. Like in Equalitys fictional culture,real-life societies have tended to ignore the ideas of solitary geniuses(McDonald 2). His ideas were swept aside violently, and his society remainedunchanged. Self-interest leads to the defiance of unjust restrictions. Equalitys government prohibits individual action. No one is allowed to doanything on their own. There is no transgression blacker than to think ordo alone(Rand 11). Equalitys defiance of his governments laws set himapart from his brothers. The condition of the Palace of Corrective Detention isdemonstrative of the unquestioning obedience of his brothers. It is easy toescapethere are no guardsThere is no reason to have guards, for men havenever defied the Councils so far as to escape from whatever place they wereordered to be (Rand 73). Unlike his brothers, Equality had the individualstrength to disobey the laws of his government. By questioning authority he tookan interest in himself and was liberated. The noblest human purpose is topursue enlightened self-interest and only those the follow that course canemerge aschampions (McDonald 2). Equalitys government had tried tocontain him from day one. Authorities cannot control him because he has anindependent mind. This totally collectiviz ed society has no powerthe individual(Branden 112). His self-interest allows him to actas independently as his surroundings would permit. Although he is enlightened byhis self-interest, he is never free from the shackles of guilt his society hasplaced upon him. No matter how freethinking Equality is, his nature is stillshaped by his society (Kelly 1). However this guilt did not stop him from actingindependently and constantly challenging the laws of his culture. Creativity isa main staple needed in order for change to take place. Equality has somehowbeen able to escape the suppression of creativity that is so deeply ingrained inhis culture. Equality is not the only person who is able to transgress in orderto create. One of his brothers, International 4-8818, is a natural artist and ispunished in an attempt to stifle his talents. They were not liked becausetheydrew pictures and theymade men laugh (Rand 27). Their governmentstrictly prohibits this sort of creativity. It is only our br others in theHome of the Artists who are permitted to draw pictures(Rand 27). Eventhough both men, Equality and International, are very talented and intelligent,they are both assigned to be street sweepers among pale boy with half abrain(Rand 17). These men were kept from sharing their gifts with theirsociety. Their society feels that those talents need to be suppressed in orderto preserve the established state of their society. They are correct in thatassumption. Creativity and individualism inevitably lead to change. .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 , .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .postImageUrl , .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 , .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:hover , .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:visited , .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:active { border:0!important; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:active , .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747 .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uedd8b6056f98dd9a1bcc72e2052fd747:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Student Athletes EssayIndividualism was the creative power revolutionizing the world (Branden12). Repression of creativity and individualism are a perfect way to inhibitsocial change. Without creativity Equalitys society will not be improvedbecause only the self-creative can enrich society (Kavanagh 1). A collectivizedsociety cannot benefit from that which only the independent mind cancreate (Branden 112). Unless a society can accept and embrace creativity,it will remain unchanged. Equalitys society is extremely afraid of inquiry. They are petrified of anyone that is able to question and challenge what theyare taught. Equality 7-2521 is perceived as a threat to the establishedorder (Gladstein 35). Equality was ostracized, punished, and nearly killedfor presenting an idea to the Council of Scholars. His interest in thescientific world had led him to a monumental discovery: electricity. He wasable, through experimentation, to understand this new force, and he eventuallyconstructed a primitive light bulb. Equality had convinced himself that hisdiscovery was so great that if he were to present it to the Council of Scholars,all his transgressions would be forgiven and his invention would be embraced. Hepresents it to the council only to arouse fear and hatred in the hearts of thescholars. The wire glowed. But terror struck the men of theCouncil(Rand 78). This intense fear of new ideas had led the Council ofScholars to take measures to prevent these types of discoveries to be made bythe common man. Children were tau ght at a young age not to question theirsurroundings. The Council of Scholars has said that there are nomysteries(Rand 18-19). This type of repression causes the society to avoidthe reality of their situation (ONeill 85). Contrary to his upbringing andthe laws of his government, Equality is able to question. He is able to thinkwith some degree of freedom. He is able to move beyond the shackles of hislimited education(Gladstein 27). Because he was born with superiorintelligence, he was able to break free and be his own man. In conclusion,Equality 7-2521 is feared because he has the capability to make major socialchange. This ability lies in his supreme intelligence, self-interest, defiance,and the ability to question. Fear is the underlying cause of all of Equalityshardships. His society is afraid of change and they know that he is capable ofrevolutionizing their world as they know it. This results in Equality beingfeared and perceived as a threat. Their fear evolves into hate and th ey want toshut Equality down. Their intense fear of Equality nearly leads to his death. However, Equality also had the strength to break free from the chains that hadbound him his whole life. He risked his dignity, his safety, and his life andwas rewarded with freedom. Many words have been granted to me, and some arewise, and some are false, but only three are holy: ?I will it!'(Rand109). BibliographyBranden, Nathaniel. Who is Ayn Rand: An Analysis of the Novels of Ayn Rand. New York: Random House, 1962. Gladstein, Mimi Reisel. The Ayn Rand Companion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984. Kavanaugh, John F. The Triumph of AynRand. America 3-10 July 1999:1-2. Kelly, David. Capitalism: The UnknownIdeal. Reason December 1993: 1. McDonald, Marci. Fighting Over Ayn Rand: ARadical Individualists Followers Cant Get Along. U.S. News and WorldReport 9 March 1998: 1-5. ONeill, William F. With Charity Towards None: AnAnalysis of Ayn Rands Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams Co.,1977. Rand, Ayn. Anthem. New York: Signet, 1946. Works Consulted Branden,Nathaniel. Who is Ayn Rand: An Analysis of the Novels of Ayn Rand. New York:Random House, 1962. Gladstein, Mimi Reisel. The Ayn Rand Companion. Westport,CT: Greenwood Press, 1984. Kavanaugh, John F. The Triumph of Ayn Rand.America 3-10 July 1999: 1-2. Kelly, David. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.Reason December 1993: 1. McDonald, Marci. Fighting Over Any Rand: A RadicalIndividualists Followers Cant Get Along. U.S. News and World Report 9March 1998: 1-5. ONeill, William F. With Charity Towar ds None: An Analysis ofAyn Rands Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams Co., 1977. Rand,Ayn. Anthem. New York: Signet, 1946.